Supreme Court ruling on abortion reminds me to take advantage of LGBTQ rights while I still can

At the start of Pride month, I told many of my friends to legally enjoy anal sex while they still could. I guess that was a funny way...



At the start of Pride month, I told many of my friends to legally enjoy anal sex while they still could.

I guess that was a funny way of saying it, but I was dead serious. I have always understood that misogyny and homophobia work in tandem. One informs the other, so if the right has spent decades plotting and plotting to overturn Roe v. Wade and outlawing abortion, one has to assume that other rights — especially any related to the LGBTQ community — will be next.

As frustrating as it was to read the Supreme Court’s decision last Friday, at least Justice Clarence Thomas didn’t bother to argue otherwise.

In a separate concurring opinion, Thomas challenged a number of previous court rulings including Obergefell v. Hodges, which established marriage equality after giving same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide, and Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down a 1973 Texas law criminalizing the act of buggery. Thomas also referred to Griswold v. Connecticut, which established the right of married couples to use contraception without government interference.

“In future cases, we should reconsider all of the substantive due process precedents of this Court, including Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process ruling is “demonstrably wrong,” Thomas wrote. “We have a duty to ‘correct the error’ regarding those established in these precedents.” So, he addedafter “reversing these manifestly erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions” protected the rights they established.

Yet some would have us believe that there is no reason to fear a direct warning.

Among them are South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who argued during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday » that Justice Samuel Alito, author of the majority opinion, “set the tone” by writing that the quashing of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court does not mean that rulings protecting contraception and same-sex marriage are in jeopardy.

“These other privacy issues like contraception don’t address life potential,” graham said. “He made a distinction between same-sex marriage and contraception, which I think will prevail over time.”

Yes, Alito wrote that “nothing in this opinion should be understood as calling into question precedents which do not relate to abortion ‘because the exercise of rights established by other decisions’ does not destroy a ‘potential life ‘” but her past views on marriage equality suggest a disdain that will not be contained much longer now that the numbers are in favor of the right.

It is only in 2020 that Thomasin an opinion joined by Alito, writes: “By choosing to privilege a new constitutional right on the religious freedom interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and in doing so undemocratically, the court has created a problem that only it can solve.

Judges have delivered their opinion in a case involving Kim Davis, the infamous Kentucky county clerk prosecuted for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The Supreme Court rejected his appeal, but it’s a new day and a clearer majority. This is especially true given Thomas and Alito’s belief that, in one way or another, they are the victims of their opposition to the civil rights of others.

“Because of Obergefell, those with sincere religious beliefs about marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society,” Thomas wrote.

According to him, “Obergefell allows courts and governments to label religious followers who believe that marriage is between a man and a woman as fanatics, making their concerns about religious freedom that much easier to dismiss.”

Alito reflected these Remarks in a 2020 speech to the Federalist Society. These are not the opinions and words of people who are considering letting go of their grievances. Jim Oberfelfell himself understands this.

Talk with People magazine about Thomas’s opinion that his case should be quashed as Roe v. Wade, Obergefell said: “It angers me and terrifies me that we have the highest court in the land that wants to harm hundreds of thousands – millions – of people across the country and put marriages in limbo and prevent people from legally committing to the person they love.

And, noting the irony that the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision, Loving v. Virginia, allowed interracial marriage, he added: “Especially when [Thomas’] her own marriage is the result of a Supreme Court decision.

I doubt Clarence Thomas cares much about irony or hypocrisy. He is a person who did not feel fit to recuse oneself of cases related to an insurrection that he looks more and more like his wife participated. A man credibly accused of sexual harassment who feels compelled to rule on women’s rights. Thomas now works a bit like a shadow CJ and now openly opposes his next targets and calls on the Tories to press charges against him.

It didn’t take long for them to answer his call.

On a Friday appearance on NewsNation”In Balance with Leland Vittert“, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he would support the Supreme Court reconsidering the cases mentioned by Thomas, and went even further.

When asked if, as Attorney General, he would feel comfortable championing a law that once again banned sodomy, Paxton replied“Yeah, listen, my job is to uphold state law and I will continue to do so.” It is my job under the Constitution and I am certainly willing and able to do it.

It only takes one case, and much to my embarrassment as a native, Texas likes to lead the way in terms of a vision of a more repressive, more armed America.

As for marriage equality, other oppressive opportunists include Utah Senate President Stuart Adams, who said at a press conference last week that he would support the Supreme Court reviewing its ruling on same-sex marriage. Utah’s constitutional ban on same-sex unions still exists and could be reinstated if the Supreme Court overturns its earlier ruling.

They heard Thomas loud and clear, and I don’t have much faith in other conservative members of the court like Brett Kavanaugh, who in his solo deal wrote, “Cancelling Roe doesn’t mean canceling those precedents, and does not mean to threaten or cast doubt on those precedents.

I don’t trust a man accused of sexual assault, his colleague the apparent ex-servant, or even their Chief Justice, the guy who spent decades trying to kill the Voting Rights Act. I wouldn’t be surprised if by 2024 or the year after, the rights to birth control, sodomy, and marriage equality are all crushed in right-wing attempts to totally alienate the right to life private.

The Republican Party has launched an all-out assault on the LGBTQ community in terms of rhetoric and legislation―and it translates into amid rising anti-LGBTQ violence. Democrats have done little to fight this national campaign. Not enough is said to uphold the dignity, humanity, and civil rights of the LGBTQ community. There is a target on our backs, and while I don’t believe all hope is lost or the Tories will ultimately win their mission to obliterate and contain us, they are clear on the plans and the means to execute them. . We should listen.

They hate us. They don’t believe we are equal. They want to remind us by judicial decree.

They won’t win, but we should be better prepared for the fight ahead.



Source link

COMMENTS

Name

Africa,972,Americas,4395,Art & Culture,16277,Arts,6829,Arts & Design,1938,Asia,3621,Automobile,585,Baseball,856,Basketball,699,Books,4251,Business,5737,Celebrity,2631,Cricket,648,Crime,158,Cryptocurrency,2221,Dance,735,Defense,836,Diplomatic Relations,2496,Economy,1419,Editorial,260,Education,1530,Elections,308,Energy & Environment,3212,Entertainment,23739,Environment,4002,Europe,4588,Faith & Religion,234,Family & Life,817,Fashion & Style,3701,Finance,22084,Food & Drink,4179,Football,1326,Games,97,Gossip,10283,Health & Fitness,4528,Health Care,979,Hockey,288,Home & Garden,917,Humour,994,Latin America,49,Lifestyle,18697,Media,527,Middle East,1776,Movies,2066,Music,3007,Opinion,4168,Other,13312,Other Sports,5513,Political News,11322,Political Protests,2324,Politics,18925,Real Estate,2350,Relationship,106,Retail,3115,Science,3000,Science & Tech,11296,Soccer,395,Space & Cosmos,467,Sponsored,3,Sports,13719,Technology,3827,Tennis,749,Theater,1994,Transportation,313,Travel,2879,TV,4033,US,1619,US Sports,1481,Video News,3531,War & Conflict,1069,Weird News,996,World,18362,
ltr
item
Newsrust - US Top News: Supreme Court ruling on abortion reminds me to take advantage of LGBTQ rights while I still can
Supreme Court ruling on abortion reminds me to take advantage of LGBTQ rights while I still can
https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/62be821c2500005a51475031.jpeg?cache=h8QQJE9K2G&ops=1778_1000%20
Newsrust - US Top News
https://www.newsrust.com/2022/07/supreme-court-ruling-on-abortion.html
https://www.newsrust.com/
https://www.newsrust.com/
https://www.newsrust.com/2022/07/supreme-court-ruling-on-abortion.html
true
732247599994189300
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content