Justice Jackson, a former law clerk, returns to a transformed Supreme Court

Less than two hours after a harrowing term ended last month, the Supreme Court welcomed a new member. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who ...

Less than two hours after a harrowing term ended last month, the Supreme Court welcomed a new member. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has been waiting in the wings since her confirmation by the Senate in April, took two oaths – and joined a boiling court.

“She’s coming into court at a time of just crazy polarization after a very important term and after this huge spring leak,” said David Lat, a legal commentator, referring to disclosure in May of a draft notice quashing Roe v. Wade, which looked a lot like last month’s decision that removed the constitutional right to abortion.

“I’m sure her colleagues will be very hospitable to her, but there may be a lot more circumspection around the building,” said Mr Lat, the author of Originating jurisdiction, a newsletter about law and the legal profession. “That might be a little weird.”

Upon rejoining the court, Judge Jackson returned to a familiar setting. She had served as law clerk to Judge Stephen G. Breyer, whom she replaced, during the term that ended in 2000. But those were very different times — and the differences illuminate both the extraordinary transformation of the institution and the challenges its newest MP will face.

In an overview of the end of term In July, New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse asked then-prominent attorney John G. Roberts Jr. for his assessment of the court’s major rulings.

“Which cases have been most visible to the public this year?” asked Mr. Roberts, who would become chief justice five years later. “Probably school prayer, abortion and Miranda, and the Tories lost all three.”

The term that ended last month also featured cases on school prayer, abortion and Miranda. This time around, however, the Conservatives won all three.

In 2000, the court was about halfway through an 11-year period without any personnel changes, the second longest period in its history.

It was by most accounts a happy place. That too has changed.

“This is not the court of this time”, judge Clarence Thomas said at a conference in Dallas two weeks after the leak, adding, “We actually trusted each other. We may have been a dysfunctional family, but we were a family.

Since the arrival of Chief Justice Roberts in 2005, there have been seven new judges. The only current member of the court serving in 2000, when Judge Jackson was clerk, is Judge Thomas.

After being sworn in last month, Judge Jackson hinted that her appointment as the first black woman to serve on the court was a milestone. “I am truly grateful,” she said in a statement, “to be part of our great nation’s promise.”

Judge Breyer, in his own statement, said his successor would fit in well on the court. “I’m happy for my fellow judges,” he said. “They gain an empathetic, caring, and collegial colleague.”

These qualities, coupled with her familiarity with the inner workings of the court, may serve Judge Jackson well. But the court’s six-member conservative majority appears set to push the law decisively to the right, and its youngest member will have little ability to slow, let alone thwart, its ambitions.

Either way, it may take some time for Judge Jackson, who has spent most of her judicial career as a trial judge, to feel comfortable with the work of the court.

Judge Thomas, who joined the court in 1991, said he asked his new colleagues how long it would take to get comfortable. “For a person, they said it takes three to five years under normal circumstances to adjust to court,” Judge Thomas said. said in 1996.

This is the usual estimate. “An intellect so extraordinary that Brandeis said it took him four or five years to feel he understood the jurisprudential problems of the court,” Judge Felix Frankfurter wrote of Judge Louis D. Brandeis, who sat at court from 1916 to 1939.

But Judge Jackson’s experience as a jurist could speed up her acclimatization. Six of the 10 justices who were once Supreme Court clerks serve on the current court: Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Jackson, Elena Kagan, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Yet the court that Judge Jackson knew in 2000 was a different place, though then as now it was dominated by Republican appointees. Indeed, it was in that sense even more unbalanced, with seven justices appointed by Republican presidents rather than the current six.

But the judges’ partisan affiliations at that time did not reliably predict their votes.

Two of the Republican-appointed court members — Justices John Paul Stevens and David H. Souter — were liberals. Two others — Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony M. Kennedy — were right-leaning moderates. Only the other three – Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Thomas and Antonin Scalia – were staunch conservatives.

That meant the two Democratic appointees on the court — Justices Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg — were very much in the mix for a court that could be unpredictable. Judge Jackson, although she will be part of a three-member liberal wing, will have less leeway.

Today, party affiliations are closely aligned with voting habits in major cases. In rulings last month on abortion, guns, religion and climate change, the six Republican appointees voted with the majority and the three Democrats disagreed.

Consider the contrasts between the decisions Mr. Roberts noted in 2000 and their 2022 counterparts.

In 2000, the court applied the principles announced in Roe v. Wade to strike down a Nebraska law that banned a late procedure that opponents call partial-birth abortion. Justice Breyer wrote the majority opinion in the decision 5 against 4.

Just seven years later, after Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. replaced Judge O’Connor, the court changed course in another 5-on-4 decision, now supporting the federal partial abortion ban law. After further staffing changes to the court, including the addition of three judges appointed by President Donald J. Trump, last month the court overruled Roe entirely.

In 2000, the court was suspicious of prayer in public schools, ruling that organized student-led prayers at high school football games violated the government’s First Amendment ban on establishing a religion.

“The delivery of a pre-game prayer has the improper effect of compelling those present to participate in an act of religious worship,” Judge Stevens wrote for the majority in a decision of 6 against 3. Four elected Republicans voted with the majority.

In June, in a decision of 6 against 3 Divided along partisan lines, the court ruled that a public high school football coach had a constitutional right to pray at the 50-yard line, ruling out the possibility of coercion.

Perhaps the most surprising decision of the 2000 term was the decision 7 against 2 reaffirming Miranda v. Arizona, the 1966 ruling that required police officers to issue the well-known warning before interrogations. The decision had been widely criticized and Congress had tried to overturn it.

But Chief Justice Rehnquist, himself a longtime critic of Miranda, wrote for the majority that the warnings were “integrated into routine police practice.” Since the Miranda decision had “announced a constitutional rule,” he wrote, a law that sought to overturn it was itself unconstitutional.

In June, in a decision of 6 against 3 that split along familiar lines, the court ruled that the police could not be prosecuted under a federal civil rights law for failing to administer the warnings. “A violation of Miranda does not necessarily constitute a violation of the Constitution,” Justice Alito wrote for the majority.

Judge Jackson might have hoped she would have the summer to settle in and prepare for major cases next term, which begin in October. But there will be activity on what critics call the court’s shadow case before that.

Indeed, the court considers an emergency request of the Biden administration to overturn a trial judge’s decision blocking the administration’s approach to immigration enforcement. She will probably cast her first vote in this case.

Important cases await Judge Jackson in the next term. In October onlythe court will hear arguments on the role that race can play in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act, the the extent of the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency to enforce the Clean Water Act and whether Andy Warhol copyright infringement committed based on a photographer’s image of the musician Prince.

The court will also hear the challenges of race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Judge Jackson, who served on one of Harvard’s governing bodies, said she would recuse herself from the Harvard case. The two cases have been combined, but the court is likely to separate them to allow Judge Jackson to hear the one against UNC

Judge Jackson’s court filing gives few clues as to how she will rule in any of the upcoming cases, though it will come as a surprise if she strays from the approach of Judge Breyer, her mentor, or of the two liberal members of the current court, the justices. Sotomayor and Kagan.

His arrival, however, could nonetheless be a welcome reset. As Judge Byron R. White liked to sayeach time there is a new judge, “it’s a different court”.

Source Link



Africa,973,Americas,4395,Art & Culture,16280,Arts,6830,Arts & Design,1939,Asia,3622,Automobile,586,Baseball,857,Basketball,701,Books,4252,Business,5737,Celebrity,2631,Cricket,648,Crime,158,Cryptocurrency,2230,Dance,735,Defense,836,Diplomatic Relations,2496,Economy,1419,Editorial,260,Education,1532,Elections,308,Energy & Environment,3213,Entertainment,23743,Environment,4004,Europe,4589,Faith & Religion,234,Family & Life,817,Fashion & Style,3703,Finance,22101,Food & Drink,4181,Football,1326,Games,97,Gossip,10283,Health & Fitness,4530,Health Care,979,Hockey,288,Home & Garden,917,Humour,994,Latin America,49,Lifestyle,18704,Media,527,Middle East,1777,Movies,2068,Music,3008,Opinion,4180,Other,13326,Other Sports,5515,Political News,11322,Political Protests,2324,Politics,18929,Real Estate,2356,Relationship,106,Retail,3115,Science,3000,Science & Tech,11299,Soccer,395,Space & Cosmos,467,Sponsored,3,Sports,13726,Technology,3828,Tennis,751,Theater,1994,Transportation,313,Travel,2880,TV,4034,US,1623,US Sports,1481,Video News,3531,War & Conflict,1069,Weird News,996,World,18367,
Newsrust - US Top News: Justice Jackson, a former law clerk, returns to a transformed Supreme Court
Justice Jackson, a former law clerk, returns to a transformed Supreme Court
Newsrust - US Top News
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content