Another attempt to end the immigration policy of "staying in Mexico"

WASHINGTON – The Biden administration is making another attempt to end a Trump-era immigration program that a court has ordered reinstat...

WASHINGTON – The Biden administration is making another attempt to end a Trump-era immigration program that a court has ordered reinstate, offering a more detailed description of the “benefits and costs” of forcing some applicants to asylum to be awaited in Mexico while their cases are pending.

“I have concluded that there are inherent problems with the program that no amount of resources can sufficiently solve,” wrote Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the secretary for internal security in the new justification for the end of the program, published on Friday.

Republicans have said the program, known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, or MPP, curbs illegal migration, while human rights activists have called it inhuman.

While the administration is still following the court order to revive the program, it hopes the new memo will answer questions raised by a Texas federal judge, who ruled in August that the justification Mr. Mayorkas planned in June to end the program was “Arbitrary and capricious.”

Condemning the program while having to put in place plans to restart it illustrates how difficult it has been for the Biden administration to keep one of President Biden’s biggest campaign promises: to reverse some of the restrictive immigration policies put in place by former President Donald J. Trump.

The MPP program, also known as Remain in Mexico, “had endemic flaws, imposed unjustifiable human costs, diverted resources and personnel from other priority efforts, and failed to address the root causes of irregular migration,” said Mr. Mayorkas in a press release. statement Friday, adding that it “does not provide the fair process and humanitarian protections that individuals deserve under the law.”

The Biden administration has continued to use a public health rule put in place by Mr. Trump at the start of the pandemic that gives border officials the power to turn back migrants, even those seeking asylum. It was used about 60 percent of the time, and many were allowed to enter the country to make asylum claims.

After Mr Biden terminated the program, Missouri and Texas took legal action to have it reinstated – in part, they said, because the termination forced them to provide government services to immigrants who were now allowed to wait here for their asylum claims to go through the slow system. Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk of the United States District Court for the North District of Texas sided with the states.

Tthe Supreme Court refused to block his order, and the administration tried to relaunch it, despite its opposition. (The program faced legal challenges during the Trump administration as well.)

The program forces asylum-seeking migrants who have left a third country and passed through Mexico to wait there for the United States to make a decision on their case. It was put in place in early 2019 and was one of many measures taken during the The Trump administration will limit who can claim asylum in the United States.

Human rights activists have argued that the program forces people to stay in unsanitary tent camps where they had to face difficult weather conditions as well as the danger of sexual assault, removal and torture.

In a court case filed Thursday, Missouri and Texas argued that the sharp increase in Haitian migrants which happened to Del Rio last month could have been avoided if the program had been in place. “The border crisis continues, in large part because the defendants do not comply in good faith” with the court order to restart the program, according to Thursday’s file. Without the program in place, the complainants said, thousands of migrants “have reason to believe they can enter the United States freely.”

In the new termination memo, Mr Mayorkas acknowledged that the data suggests there were fewer illegal border crossings while the program was in place, a point Republicans hammered home as the country saw the highest number of illegal crossings in the last 12 months in at least 60 years.

“But he did so by imposing substantial and unjustifiable human costs on people who were exposed to harm while waiting in Mexico,” he wrote, adding that “correlation does not equal causation and , even here the evidence is inconclusive “.

Since August, the administration has taken steps to restart the program, including issuing new contracts to pitch tents on the Texas border, which was in place before the Biden administration ended the program. The administration said it would be ready to restart the program in mid-November.

This prompted groups that provide legal services to asylum seekers waiting in Mexico to tell the Biden administration that they would not participate if the program was reinstated.

“We refuse to be complicit in a program that facilitates rape, torture, death and family separation of those seeking protection by committing to provide legal services,” the groups wrote in a statement. letter earlier this month.

But nothing can happen unless Mexico agrees to allow people to wait there while U.S. immigration officials review asylum claims. Homeland security officials said the government was in talks with Mexico and trying to address some of the humanitarian concerns that the country said needed to be addressed before it was restored. A request from the Mexican government is for the United States to act faster to adjudicate asylum cases, said a homeland security official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the agency’s rules.

There are more than 25,000 pending asylum claims from people affected by the program, according to transactional documents access clearinghouse data at Syracuse University. Of the cases closed, only 1.6 percent of applicants were granted asylum.

Source Link



Africa,909,Americas,4292,Art & Culture,15745,Arts,6720,Arts & Design,1841,Asia,3514,Automobile,520,Baseball,775,Basketball,606,Books,4129,Business,5594,Celebrity,2633,Cricket,648,Crime,158,Cryptocurrency,1952,Dance,649,Defense,836,Diplomatic Relations,2496,Economy,1304,Editorial,260,Education,1424,Elections,308,Energy & Environment,3134,Entertainment,23389,Environment,3871,Europe,4455,Faith & Religion,235,Family & Life,817,Fashion & Style,3554,Finance,21199,Food & Drink,4030,Football,1227,Games,97,Gossip,10289,Health & Fitness,4374,Health Care,957,Hockey,248,Home & Garden,920,Humour,994,Latin America,49,Lifestyle,18139,Media,527,Middle East,1674,Movies,1953,Music,2878,Opinion,3746,Other,12786,Other Sports,5350,Political News,11324,Political Protests,2324,Politics,18464,Real Estate,2156,Relationship,106,Retail,3116,Science,2871,Science & Tech,10843,Soccer,336,Space & Cosmos,406,Sports,13117,Technology,3695,Tennis,682,Theater,1876,Transportation,313,Travel,2767,TV,3917,US,1279,US Sports,1481,Video News,3531,War & Conflict,1069,Weird News,998,World,17675,
Newsrust - US Top News: Another attempt to end the immigration policy of "staying in Mexico"
Another attempt to end the immigration policy of "staying in Mexico"
Newsrust - US Top News
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content