The hypocrisy of the Massachusetts Democrats

It is telling that lawmakers across the region have attempted to portray their failure to support increased transparency ...

It is telling that lawmakers across the region have attempted to portray their failure to support increased transparency in the Massachusetts House of Representatives as less transparent than what they have passed.

In articles and columns published in the Daily Hampshire Gazette and The Recorder, area representatives Lindsay Sabadosa and Natalie Blais defended their votes against a bill that could have shed more light on the Massachusetts House committee votes.

In a daring act of pride, they claimed to have created more transparency than was offered. It’s smart deception, but all they did was create more transparency in the same way that Republicans in other states improved voter integrity.

Listen to me.

Republicans in other states claim to have improved voter integrity through voter suppression efforts, voter registration requirements designed to discourage voting. Likewise, Massachusetts House Democrats claim to have improved transparency by requiring the public to spend more time on information that should be in the public domain. Instead of voting in favor of a bill making all committee votes public, they argued that continued hybrid access to hearings, broadcast of formal and informal sessions, and publication only of ‘no’ votes from the committee. commission are more transparent. They failed to recognize that most people do not have time to sit during legislative sessions. And it’s safe to assume that they knew that when they adopted these so-called transparency measures.

But the rejected transparency bill concerned committee votes. Publishing only “no” votes doesn’t tell us who voted yes or who abstained. Representative Sabadosa rejected the committee’s transparency in her Gazette column because: “They plan bills, verify them for constitutionality and manage the operations of the House.” It seems to me that their take on the constitutionality of a certain bill alone requires transparency that should not be rejected, and every committee vote should be counted and made public.

Once again, Massachusetts would be the only state in the Union where the executive, legislative and judicial branches claim exemption from public records laws. And they do it because they demand that city officials and public employees adhere to open meeting laws. Hypocrisy is infuriating, but typical of partisan politics. We shouldn’t be surprised by the hypocrisy of the Massachusetts Democrats.

In 2004, Massachusetts Democrats stripped then Republican Governor Mitt Romney of his authority to make a temporary appointment to the vacant U.S. Senate seat just in case his fellow Democrat John Kerry won the presidency. Massachusetts Democrats then returned the same authority to then-Democratic Governor Deval Patrick after the death of fellow Democrat Ted Kennedy. And more recently, Representative Mindy Domb has attempted to recapture that authority when it was thought that fellow Democrat Elizabeth Warren might be approached by President Joe Biden for a cabinet post.

All was well with the Democrats, but not the Republicans’ refusal to uphold former President Barack Obama’s nomination to the Supreme Court in his last year in office, to turn around and confirm former President Donald’s candidate Trump during his last year in office. It is the same irresponsible abuse of power that breeds mistrust of our government.

We’re also talking about an organization that revealed its collective character when it re-elected her party chairman Gus Bickford after their own investigation found he had blatantly violated their own party rules. The investigation concluded that Bickford intervened in the Congressional primary between outgoing U.S. Representative Richard Neal and Holyoke Mayor Alex Morse when he encouraged students to formally accuse Morse of sexual misconduct. UMass later concluded that Morse was innocent of inappropriate relationships, but the damage was done.

Despite their own discovery of Bickford’s lack of integrity, the Massachusetts Democratic Party rewarded him by re-electing him as president.

While I am an enthusiastic supporter of progressive brands like Bernie Sanders and Warren, we should be less than enthusiastic about the Democratic Party super-majority in our state legislature. They abuse their power, put sugar on it and tell us how sweet it is.

We should not tolerate the misleading claims of lawmakers in the region and the general lack of integrity of the Massachusetts Democratic Party. After all, most voters in Massachusetts are unregistered. We deserve better. We deserve reps who don’t try to make us forget with clever sleight-of-hand.

We should be urging elected officials at the municipal level to consider running for a state-level seat, because we need their kind of experience. Current or former mayors, selected board members, school committee members, city council members, planning board members and even long-time city employees could provide better representation to the region. .

They have more applicable experience and insight into the needs of the region than those elected as a result of Massachusetts Democratic Party fundraising connections.

Michael Seward lives in Shelburne.

Source link



Africa,883,Americas,4254,Art & Culture,15556,Arts,6679,Arts & Design,1805,Asia,3473,Automobile,497,Baseball,719,Basketball,579,Books,4088,Business,5548,Celebrity,2633,Cricket,648,Crime,158,Cryptocurrency,1848,Dance,621,Defense,836,Diplomatic Relations,2496,Economy,1258,Editorial,260,Education,1374,Elections,308,Energy & Environment,3109,Entertainment,23242,Environment,3803,Europe,4408,Faith & Religion,235,Family & Life,817,Fashion & Style,3485,Finance,20880,Food & Drink,3958,Football,1166,Games,97,Gossip,10289,Health & Fitness,4306,Health Care,950,Hockey,237,Home & Garden,920,Humour,994,Latin America,49,Lifestyle,17873,Media,527,Middle East,1637,Movies,1906,Music,2832,Opinion,3575,Other,12565,Other Sports,5273,Political News,11324,Political Protests,2324,Politics,18246,Real Estate,2088,Relationship,106,Retail,3116,Science,2822,Science & Tech,10640,Soccer,302,Space & Cosmos,381,Sports,12827,Technology,3634,Tennis,658,Theater,1833,Transportation,313,Travel,2710,TV,3863,US,1054,US Sports,1481,Video News,3531,War & Conflict,1069,Weird News,998,World,17406,
Newsrust - US Top News: The hypocrisy of the Massachusetts Democrats
The hypocrisy of the Massachusetts Democrats
Newsrust - US Top News
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content