Header Ads

Breaking News

Trump Travel Ban, Part II


Passengers wait in line to use the Automated Passport Control Kiosks set up for international travelers arriving at Miami International Airport on March 4, 2015.



Photo:

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

The frenetic politics of President

Trump’s

Washington makes it easy to miss stories that once would have dominated the news. Case in point: the relatively muted response to last week’s expansion of Mr. Trump’s 2017 travel ban. While the new policy is an improvement over the original, it’s excessive and a needless slap at friendly countries.

On Jan. 31 the President signed a proclamation banning visa applications from Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar and Nigeria. These countries are imperfect but out of place on a list that also includes Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.

The new policy also includes less severe restrictions for Sudanese and Tanzanian nationals, who are no longer eligible for the green card lottery that annually gives permanent resident status to 50,000 immigrants from underrepresented countries.

“These restrictions are the result of these countries’ unwillingness or inability to adhere to our identity management, information sharing, national security, and public safety assessment criteria,” said acting Homeland Security Secretary

Chad Wolf.

He added that the constraints “are not permanent if a country commits to change.”

Mr. Trump’s 2017 travel ban faced immediate court challenges and was revised twice. In Hawaii v. Trump (2018), the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that whatever Mr. Trump said on the campaign trail about banning Muslims from the U.S., the policy was neutral and thus permissible. The Court’s conservatives deferred to the Constitution and rule of law over newfound progressive disdain for executive power.

This doesn’t mean the policy is smart. The Administration stresses this was about objective vetting procedures and security risks. Yet post-9/11 screening largely has been successful, even for immigrants from countries with terrorist enclaves. And this harsh response sends the wrong signal—particularly to Nigeria, Africa’s most wealthy and populous nation and America’s most important partner on the continent.

Nigerian Foreign Minister

Geoffrey Onyeama

said Tuesday his country was “somewhat blindsided” by the decision, as it had been making progress on information sharing. Secretary of State

Mike Pompeo

responded that he is “optimistic” the country would be taken off the list, as Chad was in 2018. But such punitive Washington decisions hurt the appeal of the U.S., especially as China and Russia deepen economic and security ties in Africa.

Mr. Wolf said that family members from the banned countries “can still visit their loved ones, businesses can still employ qualified candidates, and other visits can take place on a temporary basis.” The rollout of this policy should be less chaotic than the first ill-conceived ban in 2017. But punishing innocent people trying to come to America legally undermines Mr. Trump’s claim that he opposes illegal immigration, not immigrants more broadly.

The week’s best and worst from Kim Strassel, Bill McGurn and Dan Henninger. Image: David Cliff/Zuma Press

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Source link

No comments