Breaking News

F.D.A. Issues New Images to Add to Warnings on Cigarette Packages


WASHINGTON — The corpse is gone.

So are the grief-stricken woman and the man struggling to smoke despite a hole in his windpipe.

Nine years after the Food and Drug Administration first proposed graphic images as new warnings on cigarette packs but was thwarted by major tobacco companies in a successful court battle, the agency announced on Thursday that it is finally issuing a new set of images.

“The 13 proposed warnings, which feature text statements accompanied by photo-realistic color images depicting some of the lesser-known health risks of cigarette smoking, stand to represent the most significant change to cigarette labels in 35 years,” the F.D.A. said in a release.

The new images include depictions of chest incision scars from surgery, blackened lungs, a bulging tumor on a woman’s neck and an underweight infant.

The Tobacco Control Act, which Congress passed in 2009, required the F.D.A. to impose graphic warning labels on cigarettes.

The agency unveiled its first choices in 2010, featuring colorful — and gruesome — pictures to wrap around the top half of cigarette packages and also on 20 percent of the surface area of advertisements.

A year later, the F.D.A. whittled its final selection to nine images. Public health advocates loved them, but tobacco companies fiercely objected. Led by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, a group of businesses sued the F.D.A., and in 2012 convinced an appeals court that these specific graphic images violated its First Amendment rights of free speech. Altria, the nation’s largest tobacco company, was not part of the lawsuit.

The court mandated that the warnings be purely informational, not aimed at scaring smokers, nudging them to quit or imposing an ideology.

The ruling was a huge setback for the F.D.A., which has spent the ensuing years trying to devise a set of warning labels that would be a strong deterrent. As the agency delayed doing anything, many other nations have imposed graphic images of smoking-related damage.

Eric Lindblom, a former F.D.A. tobacco lawyer, said the agency hadn’t tried very hard.

“Once that ruling came through, the reason the F.D.A. didn’t do another one is that the lawyers were scared to death,” said Mr. Lindblom, who is now director for tobacco control and food and drug law at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University. “The F.D.A. lawyers, the health and human services lawyers, the Department of Justice lawyers, they are all scared of any F.D.A. issue that raises First Amendment issues because they lost big, and they don’t want to lose again.”

Although the rate of smoking declined from 21 percent in 2005 to 13.8 percent in 2018, there are still nearly 38 million smokers in the country and it remains the nation’s leading preventable cause of death. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 480,000 people die from smoking-related illnesses in the United States each year. Secondhand smoke can also be lethal, and is especially dangerous for children. A C.D.C. report this week said that from 2013 through 2016, more than 35 percent of nonsmoking youths aged 3 to 17 were exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke.

The United States was the first nation to require warnings on cigarettes, but they have not been updated since 1985. The National Academy of Medicine has called the current, text-only warnings “woefully deficient.”

In the new proposal released on Thursday, the F.D.A. offered a series of new warnings to accompany the photographic images. Those include that tobacco smoke can harm children and that smoking cigarettes can cause chronic and fatal lung disease, strokes and heart disease, and type 2 diabetes; can lead to cataracts and blindness, limb amputation, bladder and other cancers of the neck and head, and erectile dysfunction; and can stunt fetal growth.

In a 2019 report, the World Health Organization said warning labels “are most effective when they are pictorial, graphic, comprehensive, and strongly worded.” More than 91 countries have adopted what the organization considers strong labels, which cover at least half of the package. These include warnings about impotence — featuring sad-looking couples in bed — and magnified images of rotten teeth and cateract-covered eyeballs. Another 22 countries require graphic warnings that cover 30 percent of the pack, according to the organization.

Several published studies found mixed smoker reactions to the initial nine proposed labels. A February 2016 study published by University of Illinois researchers in the journal Communication Research suggests that graphic images could backfire, with smokers viewing the lurid images as “a threat to their freedom, choice or autonomy.”

Researchers at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill said in June 2016 that 40 percent of participants in their study said they were more likely to consider quitting after exposure to the graphic images, compared with 34 percent with the text warning. And a study led by Cornell University researchers found that graphic warnings reduced the appeal of cigarette brands among youth relative to social cue advertisements with the Surgeon General’s warnings. Neither graphic nor text warnings influenced people’s beliefs about the health risks of smoking.

But public health organizations have been pushing for them. In 2016, with the F.D.A. lagging on its revised labels, a coalition of public health groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Cancer Society, the American Lung Association and others, sued the agency for taking too long.

In March, a federal court ruled in the groups’ favor, noting that the F.D.A. had “unlawfully withheld,” and “unreasonably delayed” action to require the graphic warnings. Judge Indira Talwani set a deadline of Thursday, Aug. 15 for the agency to issue a draft, and March 15, 2020 for the final rule.


Source link

1 comment:

  1. WHAT A GREAT MIRACLE THAT I HAVE EVER SEE IN MY LIFE. My names are Clara David I’m a citizen of USA, My younger sister was sicking of
    breast cancer and her name is Sandra David I and my family have taking her
    to all kind of hospital in USA still yet no good result. I decided to go to
    the internet and search for cancer cure so that was how I find a lady
    called peter Lizzy she was testifies to the world about the goodness of a
    herbal man who has the root and half to cure all kind of disease and the
    herbal man email was there. So I decided to contact the herbal man @herbalist_sakura for my
    younger sister help to cure her breast cancer. I contacted him and told him
    my problem he told me that I should not worry that my sister cancer will be
    cure, he told me that there is a medicine that he is going to give me that
    I will cook it and give it to my sister to drink for one week, so I ask how
    can I receive the cure that I am in USA, he told me

    That I will pay for the delivery service. The courier service can
    transport it to me so he told me the amount I will pay, so my dad paid for
    the delivery fee. two days later I receive the cure from the courier
    service so I used it as the herbal man instructed me to, before the week
    complete my sister cancer was healed and it was like a dream to me not
    knowing that it was physical I and my family were very happy about the
    miracle of Doctor so my dad wanted to pay him 5 million us dollars the
    herbal man did not accept the offer from my dad, but I don't know why he
    didn't accept the offer, he only say that I should tell the world about him
    and his miracle he perform so am now here to tell the world about him if
    you or your relative is having any kind of disease that you can't get from
    the hospital please contact dr.sakuraspellalter@gmail.com or whats app him
    +2348110114739 / via his website https://drsakuraspellalter.weebly.com/
    https://dr-sakura-herbal-medicine-store.business.site/
    you can follow him up on Instagram/facebook @herbalist_sakura for the cure, he will help you out with the
    problem. And if you need more information about the doctor you can mail me
    davidclara223@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete